Comments for Open Access Working Group https://access.okfn.org Sharing the results of publicly funded research Sun, 08 May 2016 10:20:40 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.8 Comment on Open Access: Not just a matter for scientists by Open Access Content: Beauty or the Beast? – BECCALBLOG https://access.okfn.org/2012/05/17/open-access-not-just-a-matter-for-scientists/#comment-255917 Sun, 08 May 2016 10:20:40 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=461#comment-255917 […] Access Working Group (2012) Open Access: Not Just a Matter for Scientists. Available from: https://access.okfn.org/2012/05/17/open-access-not-just-a-matter-for-scientists/ [Accessed 6 May […]

]]>
Comment on New Open Access Book – ‘Knowledge Unbound: Selected Writings on Open Access, 2002–2011’ by Peter Suber by Peter Suber https://access.okfn.org/2016/04/06/new-open-access-book-knowledge-unbound-selected-writings-on-open-access-2002-2011-by-peter-suber/#comment-254319 Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:48:56 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=798#comment-254319 Thanks, Samuel. I appreciate your kind words. One small correction: Most of the pieces came from my newsletter, not my blog. None came from my blog.

]]>
Comment on Celebrating Open Access Week with PASTEUR4OA Advocacy Resources by Celebrating Open Access Week with PASTEUR4OA Ad... https://access.okfn.org/2015/10/19/celebrating-open-access-week-with-pasteur4oa-advocacy-resources/#comment-245019 Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:52:47 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=791#comment-245019 […] Celebrating Open Access Week with PASTEUR4OA Advocacy Resources | Open Access Working Group […]

]]>
Comment on The cost of academic publishing by Honest and reliable Open Access Journals in Open and Distance Education | OER Quality Project https://access.okfn.org/2014/04/24/the-cost-of-academic-publishing/#comment-244857 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:07:27 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=635#comment-244857 […] Most readers are aware that under the current publishing market model, the only organisations profiting from publishing scientific research are large corporations or predatory independent publishers that charge high rates to authors for Article Processing Charges (APCs) and/or that charge libraries high subscription fees to provide digital (not printed) access to articles, in order to make them somehow available to the readers (see the cost of academic publishing). […]

]]>
Comment on PASTEUR4OA Data Visualisations by PASTEUR4OA Data Visualisations | Open Access Working Group | Veille juridique https://access.okfn.org/2015/08/26/pasteur4oa-data-visualisations/#comment-237047 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 14:49:08 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=779#comment-237047 […] Sourced through Scoop.it from: access.okfn.org […]

]]>
Comment on PASTEUR4OA Data Visualisations by PASTEUR4OA Data Visualisations | Open Access Wo... https://access.okfn.org/2015/08/26/pasteur4oa-data-visualisations/#comment-237046 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 14:48:42 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=779#comment-237046 […] PASTEUR4OA Data Visualisations | Open Access Working Group […]

]]>
Comment on PASTEUR4OA Data Visualisations by PASTEUR4OA Data Visualisations | Open Access Wo... https://access.okfn.org/2015/08/26/pasteur4oa-data-visualisations/#comment-236823 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:16:53 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=779#comment-236823 […] Sharing the results of publicly funded research  […]

]]>
Comment on Open Access to Research Data – Timeline by Mike Linksvayer https://access.okfn.org/2015/04/30/open-access-to-research-data-timeline/#comment-235989 Sat, 15 Aug 2015 19:36:31 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=698#comment-235989

Robert King Merton, one of key researchers leading in the sociology of science, advocated in as early as 1942 that the results of research should be freely accessible to all. “Each researcher must contribute to the “common pot” and give up intellectual property rights to allow knowledge to move forward.”

I doubt that is an accurate quote. The other place it appears is http://www.paristechreview.com/2013/03/29/brief-history-open-data/ in which it is not a quote.

I read Merton’s 1942 article and the text is not to be found, not even “common pot”. But here is a good quote from the article:

“Communism,” in the nontechnical and extended sense of common ownership of goods, is a second integral element of the scientific ethos. The substantive findings of science are a product of social collaboration and are assigned to the community. They constitute a common heritage in which the equity of the individual producer is severely limited. […] Property rights in science are whittled down to a bare minimum by the rationale of the scientific ethic. The scientist’s claim to “his” intellectual “property” is limited to that of recognition and esteem which, if the institution functions with a modicum of efficiency, is roughly commensurate with the significance of the increments brought to the common fund of knowledge. […] The institutional conception of science as part of the public domain is linked with the imperative for the communication of findings. Secrecy is the antithesis of this norm; full and open communication its enactment. […] The communism of the scientific ethos is incompatible with the definition of technology as “private property” in a capitalistic economy.

English Wikipeidia on the (several) Mertonian norms.

]]>
Comment on Research Impact Measurement – Timeline by Iara Vidal https://access.okfn.org/2015/06/10/research-impact-measurement-timeline/#comment-235395 Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:51:27 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=716#comment-235395 I have two suggestions:
2012: A group of editors and publishers of scholarly journals met in December 2012 during the ASCB Annual Meeting in San Francisco and launched the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), with reccomendations to improve the ways in which the outputs of scientific research are evaluated (http://www.ascb.org/dora/).
2015: After discussions during the 2014 International conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke and Ismael Rafols publish The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics, with ten principles to guide research evaluation (http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/).

]]>
Comment on Apply to attend OpenCon2015 by chettabi https://access.okfn.org/2015/06/03/apply-to-attend-opencon2015/#comment-234476 Sat, 25 Jul 2015 09:30:55 +0000 https://access.okfn.org/?p=712#comment-234476 Collaboration Cooperation and Exchange web links of our repository university web site with yours
here is link to our university web site and archive of our university (University of Bouira – Algeria )

Repository Name: Bouira University Digital Space
Repository URL: http://dspace.univ-bouira.dz:8080/jspui/
Our OAI base URL : http://dspace.univ-bouira.dz:8080/oai/request?verb=Identify
URL University : http://www.univ-bouira.dz/

Open Access: All
Repository System: Dspace
Street: Université de Bouira – Rue DRISSI Yahia – Bouira 10000 – Algeria
Zip/Postal Code: 10000
City: Bouira
Country: Algeria
Latitude: 36.38104127
Longitude: 3.89360905

Name: Chettabi
Email Address: chettabi12@gmail.com
Phon +213790293245

Message Descriptiona of our university web site and/or Remarks:
The University of Bouira “Akli Mohand Oulhadj” Algeria has considerable advantages in being located at the crossroads of several areas with multiple purposes: agriculture, tourism and industry. The university will have an essential role to facilitate the integration of the various socio-economic fabric and the varied areas of this beautiful region located at a hundred km south-east of the capital Algiers.

Message Description archive of our university and/or Remarks:
The University of Bouira offers visitors from Bouira University Digital Space a free downloadable files (memories doctoral, master, master, courses in different technological and literary disciplines, proceedings of scientific conferences and scientific articles of high level.

Thanks
and best regrar

]]>